Ideal for MVP planning, feature prioritisation, or managing stakeholder expectations during product scoping.
<aside>
What is the MoSCoW Matrix
It is a prioritisation framework used to categorise requirements based on their importance into four categories.
This systematic approach helps teams effectively allocate resources and manage stakeholder expectations by clearly defining the importance category of each project requirement. This helps teams focus on the most critical features first, allowing for flexibility and adaptation as the project progresses.
</aside>
<aside>
Benefits of the MoSCoW Method
Improved Prioritisation: It provides a structured way to prioritise requirements, ensuring that the most important features are addressed first.
Increased Clarity: It helps the team to understand the importance of each requirement and the order in which they should be tackled.
Greater Flexibility: It allows for requirements to be moved between categories as the project evolves and new information becomes available.
Improved Communication: It facilitates better communication among stakeholders, ensuring that everyone is on the same page regarding priorities.
→ Want to add weighted scoring, auto-priority ranking, and stakeholder alignment tracking to your MoSCoW process?
Upgrade to the Premium MoSCoW System
</aside>
graph TD
subgraph "MoSCoW Categories"
M["Must Have"] --> M1["Essential features necessary for project success"]
S["Should Have"] --> S1["Important but not critical features"]
C["Could Have"] --> C1["Nice-to-have features that can be omitted"]
W["Won't Have"] --> W1["Features not included in current scope"]
end
style M fill:#ff0000,color:white
style S fill:#ff8c00,color:white
style C fill:#ffff00,color:black
style W fill:#00ff00,color:black
<aside>
MoSCoW Categories
Must Have → These are the essential features that are absolutely necessary for the project to be considered successful. They are the foundation of the project and should be prioritised above all else.
Should Have → These features are important but not critical. They are desirable and would add value to the project, but they are not essential for it to be considered a success.
Could Have → These features are desirable but not necessary. They are nice-to-have features that would be a bonus, but they can be left out if other priorities need to be met.
Won't Have → These features are not important for this project and are not included in the current scope. They may be considered for future iterations or other projects.
</aside>
<aside>
Best Practice
→ 💡 The premium version includes dashboards that automatically track your MoSCoW ratios, effort distribution, and completion status — so you can spot scope creep instantly. https://elluxioperational.gumroad.com/l/swmgr
</aside>
<aside>
⚠️ In order to see the correct information in the DB tabs, all the columns in the Source DB besides the Notes should contain relevant information.
</aside>
<aside>
:info: Go Further with the Premium MoSCoW Prioritisation System
The free version gives you the core MoSCoW framework.
The upgraded version adds:
💡 Save hours of setup and start making confident, data-backed decisions fast.
https://www.loom.com/share/795fbb53c5a04e07910826e42245db78
</aside>